The Cost of Being Right

Trading Journal Log Book

The chart was a perfect, beautiful parabola of greed. NOVA Corp’s stock had climbed for eighteen months straight, a vertical green line defying gravity and any sane metric of valuation. To Alex Rios, it wasn’t a stock; it was a monument to mania, and it was begging for a reckoning.

For three years, Alex had built a respectable trading account not on wild gambles, but on discipline. The trend was your friend, until it wasn’t. And the three-day bearish divergence on the RSI, the climactic volume spike on the last up-thrust, the break of the parabolic curve—they all whispered the same thing: the friendship was over. The fundamentals agreed: eye-watering P/E ratio, slowing user growth, the works.

With the calm certainty of a surgeon, Alex placed the trade. Short 200 shares of NOVA at $317.50. Stop-loss: $322.50, just above the recent high. A clean 1.5% risk. Target: a return to the 50-day moving average around $280. The math was elegant. The risk was defined. This was what three years of grinding discipline had been for: high-conviction setups like this.

The market open was a siren scream.

Instead of drifting lower, NOVA gapped up. Not a point or two. It ripped open 5% higher to $333 on massive volume. Alex’s screen flashed a brutal, automated message: *Order Filled. STOP-LOSS TRIGGERED. Position Closed. -$1,000.00.*

The planned loss. The cost of doing business. The logic was cold comfort. A hot spike of anger lanced through Alex’s gut. It was a clean, surgical hit, but it felt like a mugging. The news ticker told the story: RUMOR: NOVA CORP POTENTIAL ACQUISITION TARGET OF TECH GIANT. A buyout? It was the kind of headline that felt like insider trading, a universe of information moving against the little guy. The chart, so perfect an hour ago, was now a taunting, jagged green spike. It was a bull trap. It had to be. The news was rumor, fluff, a manipulation to shake out weak shorts like… well, like him.

Ego, freshly bruised, roared to life. You were right. The thesis is still sound. They’re just squeezing it. The cold sweat on his palms wasn’t fear; it was indignation.

Trading Indicators

This is where the trader ended and the gambler was born.

Fingers flying over the keyboard, Alex re-entered the short. 200 shares again. $333. But this time, his cursor hovered over the stop-loss field. He hesitated. A tight stop here would be another guaranteed loss. This needed “room to breathe.” He rationalized it with a master’s skill. I’ll be smarter this time. I’ll watch it manually. I know I’m right. He clicked “confirm” without a stop. The number one rule, carved into his psyche over three years, shattered in a single click.

The first hour was agony. NOVA chopped sideways. Every tick up was a personal insult; every tick down, a vindication that fed the addiction to being right. By lunchtime, it had climbed another 3%. The loss was no longer a planned, neat number. It was a living, growing thing, a dark pool of red in his portfolio: -$2,600.

The sink cost fallacy began its seductive whisper. It’s over-extended here. This is the perfect place to add. Lower the average. It was the siren song of the damned. He sold another 100 shares at $343. His average was now $336. The loss was larger, but his break-even was closer. He wasn’t managing risk; he was negotiating with it, trying to talk the market out of its madness.

He descended into a self-constructed echo chamber. He closed all his other charts. He hunted on social media for other bears, for any analyst who called this a “sucker’s rally.” He devoured their tweets, their charts, their bearish thesis, clinging to them like life raafts. He actively ignored the booming volume, the series of higher highs and higher lows forming on the five-minute chart. Cognitive dissonance was his bunker. The objective data on his screen was the enemy; his belief was the only truth.

The next day, NOVA gapped up again. Another 7%. The red number on his screen was no longer a figure. It was a monster. -$9,800. It was a physical weight on his chest, making it hard to breathe. The fear was acrid, a taste of copper in his mouth. A margin warning appeared in his platform—a cold, automated slap in the face. He had to deposit more funds or risk forced liquidation. He transferred money, not to save himself, but to buy more time to be right.

The confirmation came pre-market. The rumor was real. A definitive agreement. NOVA was being acquired at a massive premium.

The world shrunk to the size of his screen. The opening bell was a funeral knell. NOVA didn’t open; it exploded. A gap up of 25%. It traded at $418.

Alex’s body went numb. The monster had grown teeth. The P&L was a figure he’d only seen in his worst nightmares. It represented months of meticulous profits. It represented a new car. It represented security. Gone. Erased by his own hand. The chase was over. There was no more room to run, no more money to add, no more lies to tell himself. The weight was no longer just on his chest; it was crushing his soul.

In that absolute silence of despair, a strange clarity emerged. The ego finally broke. There was no more “being right” to fight for. There was only survival.

With a hand that trembled only slightly, he moved the mouse. He didn’t market sell in a panic. He clicked the close position button. He typed in the number of shares. He hit confirm.

The position vanished. The loss was crystallized. Catastrophic. Final.

A physical wave of relief, immense and shocking, washed over him. It wasn’t the relief of a problem solved, but of a torture ended. The fight was over. He had lost, but he had stopped losing. He sat there for an hour, hollowed out, staring at the flat line where his position used to be.

Later that night, he opened his trading journal. The page was blank. He began to write, not with emotion, but with the detached focus of a pathologist performing an autopsy.

Trade: NOVA Short

The Original Thesis: Technically sound reversal setup. High probability until unexpected, material news (buyout rumor) changed the fundamental picture. The initial stop-loss was correct and executed properly.

The Fatal Error: Re-entry post-stop. Abandonment of pre-defined risk management. Emotional driver: ego and a desire for revenge on the market. Averaging down into a losing position transformed a 1.5% risk into a 20% loss of account equity.

The Psychology: Identified emotions: Indignation (at being stopped out), Conviction (twisted into arrogance), Hope (replaced objective analysis), Fear (paralyzing, preventing corrective action).

The Lesson: The strategy didn’t fail. I failed the strategy. A trade thesis can be invalidated by new information. My job is not to be right; it is to be solvent. Discipline is the only edge.

He took a full week off. He didn’t look at a chart. He ran. He slept. He remembered what life was like without a P&L attached to every waking moment.

When he finally returned to his desk, the market hadn’t missed him. It was the same chaotic, beautiful, brutal beast. He pulled up his watchlist. He found a setup. A clean, simple trend-following play. He calculated his position size. He placed his entry. He set his stop-loss. He set his profit target.

He clicked confirm.

The trade itself was irrelevant. It would win or it would lose. The victory wasn’t in the outcome. It was in the act. The reclamation of discipline. The understanding that the cost of being right is often everything, but the cost of being disciplined is always, and only, what you planned.

👉 “Want to see how the Treadflow stacks up against more versatile options? Check out our guide to the The Right Tool for the Lock

"Disclosure: Affiliate links included. I may earn a commission at no extra cost to you."